<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 601 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123676</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed a ROM application as the case was not disposed of within six months from the date of the Final Order, as mandated by Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was influenced by a ruling of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Commissioner of C. Ex., Bangalore-III v. Denso Kirloskar Indus. Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2008 (224) E.L.T. 207 (Kar.).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:34:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 601 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123676</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore dismissed a ROM application as the case was not disposed of within six months from the date of the Final Order, as mandated by Section 35C(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This decision was influenced by a ruling of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Commissioner of C. Ex., Bangalore-III v. Denso Kirloskar Indus. Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2008 (224) E.L.T. 207 (Kar.).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>