<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 585 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123660</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the Managing Director from Rs. 1,08,000 to Rs. 50,000. The Tribunal found no evidence implicating the Director in the shortage/excess of goods and noted that the forgery of TR-6 challans was done by the Accountant without the Director&#039;s knowledge. The penalty reduction was based on the Company settling the penal provisions by paying 25% of the duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:37:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 585 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123660</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the Managing Director from Rs. 1,08,000 to Rs. 50,000. The Tribunal found no evidence implicating the Director in the shortage/excess of goods and noted that the forgery of TR-6 challans was done by the Accountant without the Director&#039;s knowledge. The penalty reduction was based on the Company settling the penal provisions by paying 25% of the duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>