<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 763 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123642</link>
    <description>Refund of customs duty was held admissible where the importer had paid duty on freight estimated above the amount actually incurred on imports. Customs valuation must reflect the actual freight incurred, and duty collected on freight not in fact incurred constitutes excess duty. On that basis, the refund claim was legally sustainable, the order granting refund was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:48:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 763 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123642</link>
      <description>Refund of customs duty was held admissible where the importer had paid duty on freight estimated above the amount actually incurred on imports. Customs valuation must reflect the actual freight incurred, and duty collected on freight not in fact incurred constitutes excess duty. On that basis, the refund claim was legally sustainable, the order granting refund was upheld, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>