<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 755 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It determined that goods supplied by sub-contractors for Mega Projects under International Competitive Bidding are exempt under Notification No. 48/04. Despite the department&#039;s objection and pending writ petition, the Tribunal applied its prior favorable decision for the assessee, as no stay was granted by the Apex Court. The judgment was pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 755 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowing the appeals with consequential relief. It determined that goods supplied by sub-contractors for Mega Projects under International Competitive Bidding are exempt under Notification No. 48/04. Despite the department&#039;s objection and pending writ petition, the Tribunal applied its prior favorable decision for the assessee, as no stay was granted by the Apex Court. The judgment was pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>