<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 382 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123627</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata set aside the duty demand on excess goods, ruling that duty would be chargeable upon clearance from the zone. Confiscation of goods for which clearance permission was available was overturned, while confiscation of unauthorized goods was upheld. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 30,000. The penalty on the company for attempting to remove goods without payment or permission was deemed justified but reduced to Rs. 10,000 due to employee culpability. No changes were made to the vehicle confiscation or penalty on the individual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 382 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123627</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata set aside the duty demand on excess goods, ruling that duty would be chargeable upon clearance from the zone. Confiscation of goods for which clearance permission was available was overturned, while confiscation of unauthorized goods was upheld. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 30,000. The penalty on the company for attempting to remove goods without payment or permission was deemed justified but reduced to Rs. 10,000 due to employee culpability. No changes were made to the vehicle confiscation or penalty on the individual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>