<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 601 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating the excess goods, as there was no evidence of clandestine clearances and the goods were awaiting segregation and entry in the RG1 register. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:11:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 601 - CESTAT,  AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating the excess goods, as there was no evidence of clandestine clearances and the goods were awaiting segregation and entry in the RG1 register. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>