<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 584 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123601</link>
    <description>An early-hearing application in a central excise appeal was allowed because the amount involved exceeded the applicable threshold. The appeal was consequently fixed for hearing on the specified date. No substantive central excise issue, legal reasoning on the merits, or final determination of the appeal is set out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:02:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 584 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123601</link>
      <description>An early-hearing application in a central excise appeal was allowed because the amount involved exceeded the applicable threshold. The appeal was consequently fixed for hearing on the specified date. No substantive central excise issue, legal reasoning on the merits, or final determination of the appeal is set out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>