<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 636 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123600</link>
    <description>Recovery of confirmed duty and penalty under an order already under challenge was treated as enforcement of an existing demand, not as a separate appealable action before the Commissioner (Appeals). In the absence of any stay from the appellate forum, the recovery letter was held to be in accordance with law. The aggrieved party&#039;s proper remedy was to seek stay from the Tribunal rather than challenge the recovery before the Commissioner (Appeals). The dismissal of the appeal as not maintainable was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 636 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123600</link>
      <description>Recovery of confirmed duty and penalty under an order already under challenge was treated as enforcement of an existing demand, not as a separate appealable action before the Commissioner (Appeals). In the absence of any stay from the appellate forum, the recovery letter was held to be in accordance with law. The aggrieved party&#039;s proper remedy was to seek stay from the Tribunal rather than challenge the recovery before the Commissioner (Appeals). The dismissal of the appeal as not maintainable was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>