<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 608 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications due to the lack of proper authorization from the Committee of Commissioners and the absence of locus standi of Shri C.M. Mehra to act as Commissioner of Central Excise, Siliguri. The decision was made after examining the authorization for filing the appeal and the validity of Shri Mehra&#039;s appointment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory compliance in the appointment of public officials, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 608 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Applications due to the lack of proper authorization from the Committee of Commissioners and the absence of locus standi of Shri C.M. Mehra to act as Commissioner of Central Excise, Siliguri. The decision was made after examining the authorization for filing the appeal and the validity of Shri Mehra&#039;s appointment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of statutory compliance in the appointment of public officials, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>