<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 392 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123593</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where the inputs are duty-paid and received in the factory, and the only defect is a procedural omission in the dealer&#039;s invoice. The document treats the invoice irregularity as a minor technical lapse that does not defeat substantive entitlement when the essential conditions for credit are otherwise satisfied. It also states that a clarificatory Board circular on such lapses applies to pending matters, and rejects the view that it operates only prospectively. Accordingly, the circular supports allowance of credit despite the document defect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 392 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123593</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot be denied where the inputs are duty-paid and received in the factory, and the only defect is a procedural omission in the dealer&#039;s invoice. The document treats the invoice irregularity as a minor technical lapse that does not defeat substantive entitlement when the essential conditions for credit are otherwise satisfied. It also states that a clarificatory Board circular on such lapses applies to pending matters, and rejects the view that it operates only prospectively. Accordingly, the circular supports allowance of credit despite the document defect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>