<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 386 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, holding that interest liability under Section 11AB accrues automatically, and notice is not required for its recovery. The case laws cited by the Commissioner (Appeals) were interpreted in light of the existing legal provisions, leading to the restoration of the interest demand vacated in the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 386 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, holding that interest liability under Section 11AB accrues automatically, and notice is not required for its recovery. The case laws cited by the Commissioner (Appeals) were interpreted in light of the existing legal provisions, leading to the restoration of the interest demand vacated in the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>