<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123585</link>
    <description>A CESTAT interim-relief note records that a 100% EOU claimed waste cleared from its blended-yarn plant was cotton waste eligible for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003. On the facts presented, the Tribunal found prima facie merit in treating the waste as cotton waste because cotton appeared to be the predominant constituent by weight. Applying a predominance-based approach to classification, it allowed unconditional stay for the assessee pending final determination of duty liability in the substantive proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123585</link>
      <description>A CESTAT interim-relief note records that a 100% EOU claimed waste cleared from its blended-yarn plant was cotton waste eligible for exemption under Notification No. 23/2003. On the facts presented, the Tribunal found prima facie merit in treating the waste as cotton waste because cotton appeared to be the predominant constituent by weight. Applying a predominance-based approach to classification, it allowed unconditional stay for the assessee pending final determination of duty liability in the substantive proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>