<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123583</link>
    <description>Spent nickel catalyst generated during manufacture was treated as waste or residue, not a dutiable manufactured product, because it was not shown to be a marketable excisable item and no specific tariff entry covered it. Modvat credit was also held admissible on denatorium saccharide used to denature ethyl alcohol, as the input was consumed in the manufacturing chain through an intermediate process even though the intermediate product was non-excisable. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s claim to both reliefs was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123583</link>
      <description>Spent nickel catalyst generated during manufacture was treated as waste or residue, not a dutiable manufactured product, because it was not shown to be a marketable excisable item and no specific tariff entry covered it. Modvat credit was also held admissible on denatorium saccharide used to denature ethyl alcohol, as the input was consumed in the manufacturing chain through an intermediate process even though the intermediate product was non-excisable. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the assessee&#039;s claim to both reliefs was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>