https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123579 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue due to a wrong authorization, finding it faulty and lacking proper signatures and dates. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed as no appeal was filed along with the authorization. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal based on the authorization's deficiencies, following a precedent requiring authorization by two different Commissioners. The appeal was deemed incorrect and unsuitable for consideration, resulting in its dismissal by the Tribunal. en-us Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:15:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123579 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue due to a wrong authorization, finding it faulty and lacking proper signatures and dates. The application for condonation of delay was also dismissed as no appeal was filed along with the authorization. The Tribunal upheld the dismissal based on the authorization's deficiencies, following a precedent requiring authorization by two different Commissioners. The appeal was deemed incorrect and unsuitable for consideration, resulting in its dismissal by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123579