<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 483 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123565</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s application for the implementation of the final order for refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) and interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act. Despite the Revenue&#039;s intention to appeal and seek a stay, the tribunal directed the original authority to pay the interest on the duty amount within 30 days. The decision was based on the principle that the Revenue must compensate the assessee for any undue delay in refunds, as established in legal judgments and CBEC circulars. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely implementation of orders and the obligation to compensate for delays in refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 13:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 483 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123565</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s application for the implementation of the final order for refund of Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) and interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act. Despite the Revenue&#039;s intention to appeal and seek a stay, the tribunal directed the original authority to pay the interest on the duty amount within 30 days. The decision was based on the principle that the Revenue must compensate the assessee for any undue delay in refunds, as established in legal judgments and CBEC circulars. The tribunal emphasized the importance of timely implementation of orders and the obligation to compensate for delays in refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>