<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 582 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123552</link>
    <description>Duty could not be demanded on waste of used fire bricks cleared after use in the factory because the bricks had been duty paid on receipt, used in manufacture, and the tariff contained no specific entry covering such waste. In the absence of a tariff classification for waste fire bricks, no excise liability could be fastened on their clearance. The demand was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:08:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 582 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123552</link>
      <description>Duty could not be demanded on waste of used fire bricks cleared after use in the factory because the bricks had been duty paid on receipt, used in manufacture, and the tariff contained no specific entry covering such waste. In the absence of a tariff classification for waste fire bricks, no excise liability could be fastened on their clearance. The demand was therefore held unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>