<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 573 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery due to the lack of quantification of duty or penalty in the impugned order. The original authority confirmed a demand of duty and penalty against the appellants for exceeding the prescribed limit of assessable value, involving clearance of computer stationery beyond the specified limit. The case was remanded to the original authority for a fresh order after the Tribunal found denial of natural justice in not supplying relevant records to the assessee, emphasizing the need for fair adjudication and access to necessary documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 573 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous applications seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery due to the lack of quantification of duty or penalty in the impugned order. The original authority confirmed a demand of duty and penalty against the appellants for exceeding the prescribed limit of assessable value, involving clearance of computer stationery beyond the specified limit. The case was remanded to the original authority for a fresh order after the Tribunal found denial of natural justice in not supplying relevant records to the assessee, emphasizing the need for fair adjudication and access to necessary documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>