https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123541 The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore, involving the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The case concerned the availment of credit for capital goods used in the manufacturing process of exempted products. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the Respondents, allowing the credit for the capital goods used in the plant producing exempted vanaspati, based on the integrated nature of the manufacturing process and the connection to the production of dutiable goods. The Judge upheld the Commissioner's decision, citing precedent and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2012 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123541 The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore, involving the interpretation of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The case concerned the availment of credit for capital goods used in the manufacturing process of exempted products. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the Respondents, allowing the credit for the capital goods used in the plant producing exempted vanaspati, based on the integrated nature of the manufacturing process and the connection to the production of dutiable goods. The Judge upheld the Commissioner's decision, citing precedent and rejecting the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123541