https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123536 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on the appellants due to unreliable eye estimation methods and lack of evidence of clandestine clearance. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate stock verification methods and factual evidence in duty demands and confiscation decisions, highlighting the errors in relying on eye estimation for physical stock discrepancies. The appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was provided in accordance with the law. en-us Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Sep 2017 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123536 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand, confiscation of goods, and penalties imposed on the appellants due to unreliable eye estimation methods and lack of evidence of clandestine clearance. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate stock verification methods and factual evidence in duty demands and confiscation decisions, highlighting the errors in relying on eye estimation for physical stock discrepancies. The appeals were allowed, and consequential relief was provided in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123536