<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 766 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123513</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, ruling that the excise department cannot challenge export quota certification by the competent agency under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958. The appeal was rejected, and the cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:38:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 766 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123513</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, ruling that the excise department cannot challenge export quota certification by the competent agency under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958. The appeal was rejected, and the cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>