<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 764 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Revenue to rectify defects by filing the proper authorization with the opinion of the Committee of Commissioners within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the appeal as not maintainable. The Revenue was also instructed to investigate allegations regarding the signature of the Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur. Compliance was scheduled for 28th January 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 764 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Revenue to rectify defects by filing the proper authorization with the opinion of the Committee of Commissioners within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would lead to the dismissal of the appeal as not maintainable. The Revenue was also instructed to investigate allegations regarding the signature of the Appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kanpur. Compliance was scheduled for 28th January 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>