<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 509 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123505</link>
    <description>The Settlement Commission admitted the applications of COFEPOSA absconders, determined duty liability, granted partial immunity from interest, and imposed penalties while granting conditional immunity from prosecution. The order highlighted the significance of full disclosure and cooperation in settlement proceedings. The applicants received varying penalties, with full immunity from penalties granted to some co-applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 509 - SETTLEMENT COMMISSION, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123505</link>
      <description>The Settlement Commission admitted the applications of COFEPOSA absconders, determined duty liability, granted partial immunity from interest, and imposed penalties while granting conditional immunity from prosecution. The order highlighted the significance of full disclosure and cooperation in settlement proceedings. The applicants received varying penalties, with full immunity from penalties granted to some co-applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>