https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123503 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand related to undervaluation of products due to lack of evidence provided by the Revenue, reducing the penalty from Rs. 1,22,699.97 to Rs. 25,000. The appellants acknowledged and did not contest the duty demand under the SSI exemption, as they were manufacturing goods under a brand name belonging to another entity, making them ineligible for the exemption. en-us Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:46:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123503 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand related to undervaluation of products due to lack of evidence provided by the Revenue, reducing the penalty from Rs. 1,22,699.97 to Rs. 25,000. The appellants acknowledged and did not contest the duty demand under the SSI exemption, as they were manufacturing goods under a brand name belonging to another entity, making them ineligible for the exemption. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123503