<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 470 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123495</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed by M/s. Cleford Shipping Company Limited, CHA, Chennai against the suspension of its CHA licence by the Commissioner of Customs. The suspension was set aside as it was found that the grounds for immediate suspension were not adequately supported by evidence of serious misconduct by the CHA. The immediate suspension was deemed unjustified as it was not based on a proximate transaction, and the regulation did not support such suspension without proper justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 470 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123495</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed by M/s. Cleford Shipping Company Limited, CHA, Chennai against the suspension of its CHA licence by the Commissioner of Customs. The suspension was set aside as it was found that the grounds for immediate suspension were not adequately supported by evidence of serious misconduct by the CHA. The immediate suspension was deemed unjustified as it was not based on a proximate transaction, and the regulation did not support such suspension without proper justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>