<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application filed by the Revenue as it was made after the lapse of the 6-month period from the date of the final order. The decision aligned with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s precedent, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory timelines for rectification of mistakes to ensure the validity and sustainability of such actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 464 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Rectification of Mistake (ROM) application filed by the Revenue as it was made after the lapse of the 6-month period from the date of the final order. The decision aligned with the Karnataka High Court&#039;s precedent, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to statutory timelines for rectification of mistakes to ensure the validity and sustainability of such actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>