https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123462 The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the demand for the extended period of limitation as the appellant had not suppressed facts with mala fide intent. The Tribunal directed a review of the interest issue under Section 11AB in light of the duty payment made under protest. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the consideration of penalty under Rule 25 due to delayed duty payment, remanding the case for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:44:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123462 The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the demand for the extended period of limitation as the appellant had not suppressed facts with mala fide intent. The Tribunal directed a review of the interest issue under Section 11AB in light of the duty payment made under protest. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the consideration of penalty under Rule 25 due to delayed duty payment, remanding the case for further proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123462