<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 549 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123456</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case, setting aside the fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner for misdeclaration of goods and overvaluation. The tribunal found flaws in determining the redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act, directing a fresh determination in accordance with the law after providing a reasonable opportunity for the party to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 549 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123456</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal remanded the case, setting aside the fine and penalty imposed by the Commissioner for misdeclaration of goods and overvaluation. The tribunal found flaws in determining the redemption fine and penalty under the Customs Act, directing a fresh determination in accordance with the law after providing a reasonable opportunity for the party to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>