<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 544 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123451</link>
    <description>The denial of credit on welding electrodes was upheld based on the interpretation of the law, with the penalty set aside due to the issue relating to the interpretation of provisions of the law. Additionally, the denial of credit on the container lock was upheld as it was not used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. The judgment was pronounced in open court, disposing of the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:41:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 544 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123451</link>
      <description>The denial of credit on welding electrodes was upheld based on the interpretation of the law, with the penalty set aside due to the issue relating to the interpretation of provisions of the law. Additionally, the denial of credit on the container lock was upheld as it was not used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. The judgment was pronounced in open court, disposing of the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>