<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 543 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 unwarranted, considering the appellant&#039;s good faith belief in the duty payment status of the imported car. The penalty was overturned, emphasizing the significance of assessing the circumstances and parties&#039; good faith in duty payment cases. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in the legality of the transaction led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:39:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 543 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 unwarranted, considering the appellant&#039;s good faith belief in the duty payment status of the imported car. The penalty was overturned, emphasizing the significance of assessing the circumstances and parties&#039; good faith in duty payment cases. The appellant&#039;s genuine belief in the legality of the transaction led to the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>