<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 738 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123441</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal against the rejection of the remission of duty application due to handling and storage loss. The Tribunal ruled that such applications cannot be rejected solely based on the failure to inform the Department within 24 hours. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 738 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123441</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal against the rejection of the remission of duty application due to handling and storage loss. The Tribunal ruled that such applications cannot be rejected solely based on the failure to inform the Department within 24 hours. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>