<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 736 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123439</link>
    <description>Deliberate suppression of the true valuation basis by under-valuing captive-consumption clearances attracts the extended period of limitation where the assessee&#039;s declarations, returns and invoices fail to disclose the differential pricing structure. The record showed a conscious reduction in the captive-consumption price through an internal resolution, rather than any bona fide distinction based on strength, market conditions or stock position, supporting intent to evade duty. As the duty demand on merits was not challenged, the confirmed demand stood, and the consequential levy of interest and penalty was also maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 736 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123439</link>
      <description>Deliberate suppression of the true valuation basis by under-valuing captive-consumption clearances attracts the extended period of limitation where the assessee&#039;s declarations, returns and invoices fail to disclose the differential pricing structure. The record showed a conscious reduction in the captive-consumption price through an internal resolution, rather than any bona fide distinction based on strength, market conditions or stock position, supporting intent to evade duty. As the duty demand on merits was not challenged, the confirmed demand stood, and the consequential levy of interest and penalty was also maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>