<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 735 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123438</link>
    <description>Common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted clearances can attract a Rule 6 Cenvat Credit demand where credit was taken in respect of exempted goods, and the merits were found against the assessee in a prior similar matter. However, extended limitation was not available because monthly returns and statutory records disclosed the exempted clearances, duty-paid clearances, assessable value, and related details, giving the department access to the relevant facts. In the absence of suppression with intent to evade duty, the demand was held time-barred and the penalty could not survive, resulting in relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 735 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123438</link>
      <description>Common inputs used for both dutiable and exempted clearances can attract a Rule 6 Cenvat Credit demand where credit was taken in respect of exempted goods, and the merits were found against the assessee in a prior similar matter. However, extended limitation was not available because monthly returns and statutory records disclosed the exempted clearances, duty-paid clearances, assessable value, and related details, giving the department access to the relevant facts. In the absence of suppression with intent to evade duty, the demand was held time-barred and the penalty could not survive, resulting in relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>