<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 533 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application and corrected the recital stating that the assessee had failed to discharge the burden of proving non-passing of duty. It also corrected the figures recorded in the earlier order. The operative effect was limited to amending the prior order on these points, without any broader adjudication on liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:41:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 533 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application and corrected the recital stating that the assessee had failed to discharge the burden of proving non-passing of duty. It also corrected the figures recorded in the earlier order. The operative effect was limited to amending the prior order on these points, without any broader adjudication on liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>