<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 531 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123411</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred due to late filing, even though it was argued that the filing was within the extended period. The Tribunal decided to waive the delay in the interest of justice and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a decision on the merits. The requirement of pre-deposit was also waived to ensure a fair adjudication focusing on substantive issues rather than procedural technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:13:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 531 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123411</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) as time-barred due to late filing, even though it was argued that the filing was within the extended period. The Tribunal decided to waive the delay in the interest of justice and remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for a decision on the merits. The requirement of pre-deposit was also waived to ensure a fair adjudication focusing on substantive issues rather than procedural technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>