<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 529 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123409</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit directed for hearing of an appeal must be complied with by the concerned unit itself. Payment made from the Cenvat credit account of another unit was not accepted as valid satisfaction of that condition. On that basis, the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act was treated as not fulfilled, and the appeal was liable to dismissal for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 529 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123409</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit directed for hearing of an appeal must be complied with by the concerned unit itself. Payment made from the Cenvat credit account of another unit was not accepted as valid satisfaction of that condition. On that basis, the pre-deposit requirement under section 35F of the Central Excise Act was treated as not fulfilled, and the appeal was liable to dismissal for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>