<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 730 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123401</link>
    <description>The appeal against the order of adjudication by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata IV was remanded by the Tribunal to the Appellate Authority for re-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of detailed examination of evidence and ensuring a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case. The decision aimed to uphold compliance with the law and provide a reasonable opportunity for all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:35:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 730 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123401</link>
      <description>The appeal against the order of adjudication by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata IV was remanded by the Tribunal to the Appellate Authority for re-examination. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of detailed examination of evidence and ensuring a fair opportunity for both parties to present their case. The decision aimed to uphold compliance with the law and provide a reasonable opportunity for all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>