<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123400</link>
    <description>A prima facie challenge to inclusion of inter-unit clearances in the aggregate turnover for small scale industry exemption can justify interim relief where the exemption notifications and cited precedent support separate treatment of the disputed clearances. In the stated dispute, the Tribunal examined whether clearances to a sister export oriented unit and related export clearances should be counted for exemption computation, and found that the appellant had shown a prima facie case against such inclusion. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted, while the merits of the duty demand were left open for final adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 729 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123400</link>
      <description>A prima facie challenge to inclusion of inter-unit clearances in the aggregate turnover for small scale industry exemption can justify interim relief where the exemption notifications and cited precedent support separate treatment of the disputed clearances. In the stated dispute, the Tribunal examined whether clearances to a sister export oriented unit and related export clearances should be counted for exemption computation, and found that the appellant had shown a prima facie case against such inclusion. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted, while the merits of the duty demand were left open for final adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>