<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 718 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123389</link>
    <description>The case was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as the importer failed to produce the necessary certificate under the Insecticide Act, 1968. The appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:36:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 718 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123389</link>
      <description>The case was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai as the importer failed to produce the necessary certificate under the Insecticide Act, 1968. The appeal was deemed not maintainable under Section 129A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>