https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123373 A forfeiture of part of a CHA security deposit could not be sustained where the show cause notice only proposed suspension or revocation of the CHA licence and contained no proposal for forfeiture. After the Commissioner dropped the revocation proposal on accepting the CHA's defence, a separate forfeiture order was still made without independent notice or reasons. As the main charge was not upheld and the forfeiture lacked procedural support, the order was set aside. en-us Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123373 A forfeiture of part of a CHA security deposit could not be sustained where the show cause notice only proposed suspension or revocation of the CHA licence and contained no proposal for forfeiture. After the Commissioner dropped the revocation proposal on accepting the CHA's defence, a separate forfeiture order was still made without independent notice or reasons. As the main charge was not upheld and the forfeiture lacked procedural support, the order was set aside. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123373