<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 703 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123369</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It was found that the adjudicating authority exceeded the scope of the show cause notices by disallowing deductions for freight and octroi charges due to a perceived shift in the place of removal, an issue not raised in the notices. The Tribunal emphasized that the authority erred in not considering documentary evidence and not indicating deductions in the invoice value, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:31:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 703 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123369</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It was found that the adjudicating authority exceeded the scope of the show cause notices by disallowing deductions for freight and octroi charges due to a perceived shift in the place of removal, an issue not raised in the notices. The Tribunal emphasized that the authority erred in not considering documentary evidence and not indicating deductions in the invoice value, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>