<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 688 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the Revenue&#039;s repeated adjournment requests, causing significant delays in a case involving duty and penalty. Despite granting a stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit, the Tribunal emphasized the need for timely resolution and efficient proceedings. It highlighted the lack of proper assistance from the Revenue and directed higher authorities to address the issue. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for the final time, strictly instructing no further delays, maintaining the stay until final resolution. The judgment underscored the importance of proactive support from the Revenue for effective Tribunal operations and justice delivery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:05:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 688 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal expressed dissatisfaction with the Revenue&#039;s repeated adjournment requests, causing significant delays in a case involving duty and penalty. Despite granting a stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit, the Tribunal emphasized the need for timely resolution and efficient proceedings. It highlighted the lack of proper assistance from the Revenue and directed higher authorities to address the issue. The Tribunal adjourned the matter for the final time, strictly instructing no further delays, maintaining the stay until final resolution. The judgment underscored the importance of proactive support from the Revenue for effective Tribunal operations and justice delivery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>