<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 685 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) against a duty demand and penalty imposed on the assessee for incorrect Cenvat credit availing. The dismissal was due to an unexplained delay in filing the appeal, with no valid reasons presented within the statutory limitation period. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement but upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the significance of complying with legal timelines and providing adequate justifications for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:46:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 685 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) against a duty demand and penalty imposed on the assessee for incorrect Cenvat credit availing. The dismissal was due to an unexplained delay in filing the appeal, with no valid reasons presented within the statutory limitation period. The Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement but upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the significance of complying with legal timelines and providing adequate justifications for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>