<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123340</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai overturned penalties imposed on an exporter and their Customs House Agent (CHA) under Section 114 of the Customs Act for misdeclaration of weight in a shipping bill. The Tribunal found that the weight discrepancy was promptly rectified through a valid amendment to the shipping bill, correcting the error. Emphasizing the effectiveness of amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act, the Tribunal ruled that the parties were not liable for penalties as the misdeclaration was corrected. Consequently, both penalties were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the exporter and CHA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 683 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123340</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai overturned penalties imposed on an exporter and their Customs House Agent (CHA) under Section 114 of the Customs Act for misdeclaration of weight in a shipping bill. The Tribunal found that the weight discrepancy was promptly rectified through a valid amendment to the shipping bill, correcting the error. Emphasizing the effectiveness of amendments under Section 149 of the Customs Act, the Tribunal ruled that the parties were not liable for penalties as the misdeclaration was corrected. Consequently, both penalties were set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favor of the exporter and CHA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>