<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 679 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123336</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the classification of the goods as marble based on the Chemical Examiner Report, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they were Dolomite. The tribunal found no error in the classification as marble due to the composition of the goods. As the issue centered on classification and the initial report was inconclusive, the tribunal deemed it inappropriate to impose a redemption fine and penalty, ultimately setting aside the fines and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 10:03:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 679 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123336</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the classification of the goods as marble based on the Chemical Examiner Report, despite the appellant&#039;s argument that they were Dolomite. The tribunal found no error in the classification as marble due to the composition of the goods. As the issue centered on classification and the initial report was inconclusive, the tribunal deemed it inappropriate to impose a redemption fine and penalty, ultimately setting aside the fines and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>