<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 758 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications by the Commissioner of Customs seeking modification of Final Order No. 507-560/07 for importers of machines declared as &quot;Computerised Embroidery Pattern-making Machine with Plotter.&quot; The revised directions required involvement of jurisdictional officers or the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for inspections, along with competent experts. M/s. Silver Stitch&#039;s application was dismissed as they could raise their grievance during de novo adjudication. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for parties to be heard and access to inspection reports during the adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:31:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 758 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications by the Commissioner of Customs seeking modification of Final Order No. 507-560/07 for importers of machines declared as &quot;Computerised Embroidery Pattern-making Machine with Plotter.&quot; The revised directions required involvement of jurisdictional officers or the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence for inspections, along with competent experts. M/s. Silver Stitch&#039;s application was dismissed as they could raise their grievance during de novo adjudication. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing a reasonable opportunity for parties to be heard and access to inspection reports during the adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>