https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123322 Supplies made to projects funded by the Asian Development Bank were treated as exempt under the relevant notification, on the basis that the Bank qualified as an international organisation. The dispute concerned whether, for Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the same supplies were nevertheless outside the exception to reversal of Cenvat credit. As the exemption benefit had already been extended on the footing that the Asian Development Bank was an international organisation, the applicant was found to have a prima facie strong case. Unconditional stay of the demand was therefore granted. en-us Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:14:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123322 Supplies made to projects funded by the Asian Development Bank were treated as exempt under the relevant notification, on the basis that the Bank qualified as an international organisation. The dispute concerned whether, for Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the same supplies were nevertheless outside the exception to reversal of Cenvat credit. As the exemption benefit had already been extended on the footing that the Asian Development Bank was an international organisation, the applicant was found to have a prima facie strong case. Unconditional stay of the demand was therefore granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123322