<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123319</link>
    <description>Steel items such as M.S. plates, channels, H.R. sheets, tor steel, joists, coils, CTD bars, flat steel, shapes, sections and slide slitting were treated as capital goods where they were used for erection, fabrication, strengthening, repair and maintenance of machinery in sugar manufacture. On those facts, the items were regarded as components, spares or accessories of machinery falling under Chapter 84, making Cenvat credit admissible under Rule 2(b)(iii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. Prior Tribunal rulings on similar steel goods supported the view that materials essential to plant and machinery form part of the manufacturing process, and the assessee succeeded on credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:59:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 752 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123319</link>
      <description>Steel items such as M.S. plates, channels, H.R. sheets, tor steel, joists, coils, CTD bars, flat steel, shapes, sections and slide slitting were treated as capital goods where they were used for erection, fabrication, strengthening, repair and maintenance of machinery in sugar manufacture. On those facts, the items were regarded as components, spares or accessories of machinery falling under Chapter 84, making Cenvat credit admissible under Rule 2(b)(iii) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. Prior Tribunal rulings on similar steel goods supported the view that materials essential to plant and machinery form part of the manufacturing process, and the assessee succeeded on credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>