https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123316 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order in a case involving the interpretation of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants had deposited the duty before appealing, as required by Section 35F. The Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the appeal despite the deposit. The Tribunal's decision led to the refund of the duty deposited, which was sanctioned by the Adjudicating Authority. The Revenue appealed this decision, but the Commissioner (Appeals) ultimately set aside the adjudication order, emphasizing the appellants' compliance with Section 35F. Compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F is crucial when appealing duty demands or penalties under the Act. en-us Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:47:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123316 The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order in a case involving the interpretation of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants had deposited the duty before appealing, as required by Section 35F. The Commissioner (Appeals) had rejected the appeal despite the deposit. The Tribunal's decision led to the refund of the duty deposited, which was sanctioned by the Adjudicating Authority. The Revenue appealed this decision, but the Commissioner (Appeals) ultimately set aside the adjudication order, emphasizing the appellants' compliance with Section 35F. Compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F is crucial when appealing duty demands or penalties under the Act. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123316