<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 741 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123308</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of mis-declaration of imported goods and assessable value, rejecting appellants&#039; arguments. However, it set aside the confiscation of containers and reduced fines and penalties imposed, citing excessive amounts and incorrect liability considerations. The Tribunal modified the orders, reducing fines and penalties to more reasonable levels, granting some leniency to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 741 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123308</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s determination of mis-declaration of imported goods and assessable value, rejecting appellants&#039; arguments. However, it set aside the confiscation of containers and reduced fines and penalties imposed, citing excessive amounts and incorrect liability considerations. The Tribunal modified the orders, reducing fines and penalties to more reasonable levels, granting some leniency to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>