<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 736 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123303</link>
    <description>Confiscation of a truck and penalty on its owner were found unsustainable where the Revenue failed to prove knowledge or connivance in transporting contraband goods. The conveyance was located inside factory premises with goods loaded, but the record did not show that the owner or driver knew the goods were contraband. The absence of documents being handed to the driver, by itself, was insufficient to establish culpability. On that basis, confiscation and penalty were not justified, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=160273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 736 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123303</link>
      <description>Confiscation of a truck and penalty on its owner were found unsustainable where the Revenue failed to prove knowledge or connivance in transporting contraband goods. The conveyance was located inside factory premises with goods loaded, but the record did not show that the owner or driver knew the goods were contraband. The absence of documents being handed to the driver, by itself, was insufficient to establish culpability. On that basis, confiscation and penalty were not justified, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=123303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>